.

Qualifying Error Cause of Late-Filing Fees for Brookhaven Candidates

All candidates in Brookhaven's election may have also been erroneously fined. Mayoral candidate J. Max Davis is the only one whose fine has been deleted.


Brookhaven mayoral candidate J. Max Davis' late-filing campaign contribution disclosure fine was deleted from the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission's website on Tuesday morning.

Each of Brookhaven's four mayoral candidates had outstanding fines of $125 for not filing their campaign disclosure reports by Sept. 30, which does not apply to the Brookhaven special election. These erroneous fines were likely the result of a filing schedule error, according to the commission's executive director.

Brookhaven Patch received a forwarded email from Davis that was originally sent to him from Holly LaBerge, the executive director of the commission.

The email read:

Hello Mr. Davis;

Per our phone conversation this morning, you do not have a late fee for the September 30, 2012 EY CCDR.  You qualified for a special election and would follow that reporting schedule, not the regular election year schedule.  If you have any further questions, please let me know.

Regards,
Holly

In a follow-up call, LaBerge said DeKalb County qualifying officers "entered everyone as qualifying for the general (election), which is incorrect. That is not what Brookhaven is holding."

Brookhaven is holding a special election, which means candidates are required to file their campaign contribution reports by both deadlines of Oct. 28 and of Jan. 8, 2013 to avoid $125 late-filing fees.

Since the Sept. 30 deadline for filing campaign contribution disclosure reports is required for those candidates in the general election, not Brookhaven's special election, any late-filing fees for the Sept. 30 deadline would be inactivated, LaBerge said.

She said the candidates will need to call the commission to get the fees inactivated.

"We'll respond as quickly to them as we can. We're severely short-staffed. It probably won't happen the day they called," LaBerge said.

LaBerge said Davis is the only candidate who has contacted her, and he called her Tuesday (Oct. 23) morning.

"It just so happened that Mr. Davis called this morning at a time when I was sitting at my desk, was not on the phone and was able to take his phone call and was able to take care of his right away. It's not necessarily going to happen with everybody else. It's just going to depend upon what we're in the middle doing when somebody calls," she said.

However, for candidate Sandy Murray, there are two other outstanding fines of $125, for a total of $250, which could still stand since her campaign for State Representative of District 80 is showing as active under one name and terminated under another. The ethics commission website is showing that she did not file her personal candidate financial disclosure report by the June 8 or Aug. 30 deadlines while running for state representative.

UPDATE: Murray filed a personal financial disclosure statement on Oct. 7. However, Murray's campaign manager Tim Alborg said that due to "a clerical error," her financial statement was filed as covering the year 2011, instead of 2012.

The other mayoral candidates have different situations which led to their ethics violation fines.

In the case of candidate Larry Danese, for example, the commission website shows that he did file a campaign disclosure report on Oct. 16, which would have been deemed late for this erroneous filing deadline in the Brookhaven Special election, but actually is late for the deadline required by candidates for DeKalb County Commissioner. Danese had qualified to run for District 1 commissioner in DeKalb, and the commission site shows this campaign as active.

Danese was defeated for this seat in the Georgia Primary election, and he is not on the Nov. 6 ballot for DeKalb County District 1 commissioner. Danese still has an additional outstanding fine of $125 for not disclosing a report of his campaign for District 1 DeKalb County Commissioner.

Danese said he tried to e-file the termination of his commissioner campaign, but there was a technical glitch. He went to the state ethics commission in person and there was directed to take a class about filing campaign disclosure reports.

"In all honesty, I knew more about it than my instructor, who wasn't able to help me," Danese said. "I did my best to rectify that mistake, and I wasn't able to. I was mesmerized by their reluctance to just answer my question and instead had me go to a class."

Danese said he has paid the fine, despite not agreeing that he should have had to do so.

Candidate Thom Shepard also filed a campaign contribution disclosure report on Oct. 15, also late for this incorrect filing deadline which does not apply to the special election.

 

Brookhaven Patch will continue to report the details as we receive and uncover them.

No City Sandy October 23, 2012 at 10:14 PM
Still hear the crickets chirping.wher is all the hyperbole and righteous indignation from the regular crew? Their posting on this subject has been noticeably absent except for when they thought j.Max was just as guilty as Murray. When their hopes were dashed they forgot their regular routine of posting all day about who is transparent and corrupt etc. Just admit your politics aren't based on real morals or principals,but rather a series of emotional and irrational tactical moves. Just say something about Murray's fines and lack of disclosure and move on. Eddie? Carl? Burger? Freddie K? Kestrel?Telford?Enuff? ....Buehler....Buehler..?
Just wondering October 23, 2012 at 10:16 PM
Hamburger, after reviewing the filings on-line, i am still looking for these over reaching campaign contributions to Mr Davis. Please outline these Major contributions from potential vendors so we can all see the millions he has received!!! Sorry, didn't happen like you had wished. Glad you are still voting for him though.
Thom Shepard October 24, 2012 at 06:54 AM
Watchdog, You incorrect on several counts. First this is not the Secretary of State office. It is the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission office, unofficially refered to as the State Ethics Office. Second is looking like the problem was caused by someone in DeKalb County government acting as the official for the City of Brookhaven elections. If it turns out it is in fact the Voter Registration and Elections Office of DeKalb County it would be the second error on their part for this election. The first error was when they informed candidates they were the official receiver of the State Ethics Office form DOI which should be filed before receiving any campaign contributions. They actually provided this form, requested it be turned in and copied and returned it to candidates despite the fact that this practice is no longer proper procedure. I have come to expect such disregard for state law in the BOC and executive branches of the Dekalb Government but I really did not expect such in the voting and qualifying office. It is a shame this seems to have been a distraction for many of the candidates. Thanks again DeKalb.
Roger That October 24, 2012 at 10:04 AM
DOH!
Watchdog October 24, 2012 at 03:03 PM
Thom, thanks for correcting my error. As I said, If folks are interested, they should check fort themselves. And I agree, I am tired of these quibbledicks and their supporters going on about peripheral issues, and not the things that really matter.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »