patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Ellis: Cityhood Harms County Government

Has Brookhaven's incorporation hurt DeKalb? Take our Patch poll and tell us what you think.

  • Has Brookhaven's cityhood harmed DeKalb County?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        6 (33%)
    • No
        9 (50%)
    • Made no difference
        3 (16%)
    Total votes: 18
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
 

DeKalb County CEO Burrell Ellis said this week recent and ongoing cityhood movements and annexations harm county services, and the state legislature needs to grant the county more oversight over these issues.

Continued withdrawls of land from unincorporated DeKalb County into existing or new municipalities also threaten to slow the county's economic recovery, Ellis said Tuesday before a group of county businessmen Tuesday in his 2013 State of the County speech.

Newly elected Brookhaven Mayor J. Max Davis said Thursday he disagrees with Ellis and believes any legislation that would limit the formation of new cities such as Brookhaven or annexation is "a shot across the bow of our democracy."

"To me, it's un-American," he said.

Every time a new city is formed or land is annexed into existing municipalities, the county simply has fewer residents and businesses it's required to service, Davis said. The county's budget should be cut accordingly. But county taxes continue to rise, he said: "It's an inverse relationship. ... [Cityhood movements] are a symptom of what the county is doing."

Ellis' speech was given at the Thalia N. Carlos Hellenic Community Center off Clairmont Road.

Here is the text of Ellis' thoughts specifically on those two issues:

During the past two years, DeKalb County has been forced to take a defensive posture at the Georgia General Assembly. Efforts to incorporate or annex prime real estate have severely hurt our bottom line. A fractured county will not lift us out of the economic recession.

In actuality, it might place us deeper in it.

This is the struggle of a great community!

I say this not harboring any ill will to our city leaders or anti-city sentiment. In fact, my relationship with the mayors in DeKalb County is based on mutual respect, friendship, and a desire to serve our respective constituents as best as we can.

But, unique state law on this issue has allowed revenue shifting from the County to city governments, and that hurts us all, whether we live in incorporated or unincorporated portions of the County.

We have now reached a “tipping point” where continued annexation will hamper the ability of the county to adequately fund essential services – from courts and criminal justice, to libraries and elections – that all of our citizens depend upon.

The Board of Commissioners and I have asked our delegation to amend the state code to require approval by the county for annexation of areas that currently receive county services. We also want their support of legislation providing property owners new rights to weigh in on matters pertaining to annexation.

We believe these steps will protect the interests of all our citizens and allow for greater dialogue between DeKalb County and its cities to develop a strategy that emphasizes collaboration instead of confrontation.

All local governments – cities and counties - face the same challenges of trying to balance our budgets while providing our constituents the frontline services they depend on. I see no reason why we cannot find a solution together.

This is the struggle of a great community!

The North Druid Hills-Briarcliff area has been the subject of increased cityhood chatter. Here is some of our coverage of that:

The city of Decatur is also considering annexing a significant portion of commercial property in North Decatur.

What do you think of Ellis' comments? Tell us in the comments section below.

Related Topics: Burrell Ellis

Patrick

1:05 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

While I am overall ambivalent to the cityhood movements and do not like Burrell Ellis Ellis makes one good point:

"Efforts to incorporate or annex prime real estate have severely hurt our bottom line"

Virtually all the areas that have incorporated or annexed are business or wealthy residential areas, these areas are high income, low cost areas for cities to manage.

The Brookhaven area generated more revenue than expenses to run back when it was solely in the county allowing some of that excess revenue to be used to support the lower income areas where the tax revenue does not cover all the expenses.

Reply

Ricky W Kracker a.k.a. Diggy Swagga

1:05 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

While I understand his concerns and how annexation impacts the traditional power structure of Dekalb County, the relationship between cities and town is not a new one. It is in no way un-American or unusual. Should we do away with all cities in Dekalb County? Why stop there, why not banish all counties in Georgia and have only state control. And really, what is the point of state and federal government? Let's do away with the states and have a single, federal government. Think of the money that could be saved!

Reply
Comment_arrow

don Gabacho

4:58 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

"And really, what is the point of state and federal government? Let's do away with the states and have a single, federal government. Think of the money that could be saved!"---Rick

Mx's federal government never spends its own money.

PkCk

1:05 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Mr. Ellis is a very slow learner if he thinks the solution to DeKalb's problems is for the state to 'to grant the county more oversight over these issues [cityhood movements and annexation].'

OK, so maybe DeKalb was surprised by Dunwoody's cityhood movement. However afterward, DeKalb did nothing to evaluate and improve the county's level of service. Their inaction resulted in Brookhaven Cityhood. What has the county done since Brookhaven? More blah blah about One DeKalb, and threats to raise the cost for garbage collection or cut service or both. Garbage collection is not affected by cityhood, but it is symptomatic of DeKalb County inefficiency. DeKalb leaders had better wake up and make some adjustments or there will be more cityhood movements.

Reply

"E Pluribus Unum"

1:07 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I agree. Anyone who doesn't is in denial IMHO. Enough said.

Reply

Georgia Mom

12:54 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

Does Mr. Ellis believe this is happening because of spite? Or is it really more for self preservation? He states that this is a struggle of a great community. It was a great community under Manuel Maloof - but no more. The county government and school system are rife with mismanagement and cronyism. Who wants to move to such a county? What businesses will want to open up shop here? What high school student aspires to graduate from an unaccredited school?

Reply

Dean

3:19 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

The question should be: Does the DeKalb Democrat bureaucracy harm residents of Brookhaven (indeed all residents)?

Reply

HamBurger

4:54 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

I think the new cities AND Burrell Ellis have harmed DeKalb County. Getting ready to enjoy an additional layer of government and less service delivery so the new city can keep its promise of lower taxes . . . Until my Overlords decide it is time to raise taxes!

Please pass the yellow mustard!

Reply
Comment_arrow

HamBurger

6:06 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013

And, I think Rep, Mike Jacobs, Rep, Tom Taylor and Sen. Fran Millar have contributed to the downfall of DeKalb by not encouraging restructuring of DeKalb government, demanding reform in DeKalb and involving themselves in a clean-up of DeKalb County School system instead of concerning themselves with new cities in DeKalb and the resurrection of Milton County.

But, that is just me . . . Or, is it?

Please pass the yellow mustard!

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

3:28 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Mr. GLD, whatever you do, don’t tell Rep. Jan Jones!

Please pass the yellow mustard!

Comment_arrow

Eddie E.

4:06 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Russell,

Are you still licking your wounds or will you just be sour for the rest of time?

Comment_arrow

don Gabacho

5:57 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

"Rep, Mike Jacobs, Rep, Tom Taylor and Sen. Fran Millar have contributed..."---Hamburger

Nothing but the ultimate downfall of anything they involve themselves in.

Except, perhaps, Mexican comic books.

TomMiller1

7:24 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

"the county simply has fewer residents and businesses it's required to service" ... when I voted for Brookhaven, I still remained in Dekalb County. My license plate tells me so. My jury duty summons does likewise.

I'm no longer a resident of dekalb? what kind of nonsense is that?

Reply
Comment_arrow

PkCk

8:44 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

@ I'm no longer a resident of dekalb? what kind of nonsense is that?

"the county simply has fewer residents and businesses it's required to service" The mayor referrs to the services Brookhaven will provide. Of course we are still residents of DeKalb; and DeKalb will continue to receive most of our taxes. However starting now, Brookhaven's taxes for city services will be controlled by Brookhaven. The city is on course to prove that we can REPLACE certain county functions and costs with city services, getting better service for less tax.

Joe

9:56 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013

All this, coming from a guy whose house was just raided by the cops.

Dunwoody should have been Dekalb's wake up call, but nooooo. Just the hint of a Brookhaven city movement in the wind should have been a wake up call, but nooooo.

Dekalb could have been the biggest and most effective voice against the cityhood movement...All they had to do was to come out and say "We hear you. You have not been getting the services you deserve. And here is what we are going to do to make sure you folks are happy and to convince you that you don't need a city. We are going to ____________________________________" But, noooooo.

And he's proven to be quite tone deaf when his response isn't upping the County's game, taking care of business for his constituents in the (entire) county, but instead, asks the State to make it a law that the County has to approve the next cityhood movement. That is classic Democratic "logic"...."People shouldn't be free to decide what's best for them! That's GOVERNMENT'S job! People aren't smart enough to decide what's best for them; but I am!....and so are my pals Cynthia McKinney, and Hank Johnson! "

It's like me asking the state to make it a requirement that my approval is required in the event my wife wants to go it on her own.

Reply

Phil

11:04 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013

Totally agree, Joe. Dekalb County has ignored many areas of the county in order to make "investments" in areas where Ellis's votes are. Numerous third party studies of the county government's inefficiency has not had any effect. And the county wonders why cityhood is attractive for some areas? And I love the red herring complaints that people should have tried to work with the county. As is that has never been done.

Reply

CrowBurger

5:59 am on Monday, February 4, 2013

There was no choice in the poll for "Hopefully." Ellis should jump the next SOPA BOX CAR and ride his new track straight to the new jail.

Reply

Leave a comment