patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

State Law Allowing Cityhood Creates Economic Classism

Drawing on historic comparison, Ellis calls Jacobs opinion piece 'nonsense'

 

There may be a reason for residents of DeKalb County to consider voting for another layer of government, but it is not the nonsense presented by Rep. Mike Jacobs in his op-ed on cityhood. Any eighth grade history student knows the American Revolution was conceived on the flawed principle of taxation without representation.  What we have here is exploitation of current state law based on bad public policy.  This is why:

When choice commercial and residential properties are usurped into newly proposed cities, it increases the tax burden for everyone who is left outside of the city limits. This is actually a more accurate application of Jacobs’ analogy. The citizens and businesses of DeKalb who will shoulder the cost (i.e. increased tax burden) of a new city cannot vote on it under current law.  That’s taxation without representation.

 The current law also creates economic classism and dilutes the voting strength of minorities. It moves us as a county and region further away from the “beloved community” that our native son, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., often advocated. 

It is wrong to mislead residents into thinking that somehow their taxes will go down if they create a new city. Ask any newly created city, revenues are always over-estimated and expenses are underestimated. It is time to tell the truth to our citizens—if the referendum passes, residents of Ashford/Brookhaven will pay more in property taxes than they do right now.

It is also a tactic of Rep. Jacobs to bring out the “wasteful government” boogeyman. Let’s examine the facts:  Since 2009, I have cut spending by $130 million and the overall operating budget has declined from $636 million to $559 million. We are working with 1,000 fewer employees than we had in 2008, and maintaining the same levels of government services. We are the most efficient government of its size, anywhere.

State lawmakers should address the inequity in the law that pits cities against counties and neighbors against neighbors.  Let us work on those things that bind us together as ONE DeKalb, as one beloved community. Rep. Jacobs’ divisive rhetoric harkens back to a time and era that this state, region and nation have long since rejected.”

 

Burrell Ellis is the CEO of DeKalb County.

About this column: A place where Brookhaven and Chamblee residents can have their say on any issue. Related Topics: Brookhaven Cityhood, Brookhaven Incorporation, Burrell Ellis, and Mike Jacobs

Dean

6:37 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

"We are the most efficient government of its size, anywhere."

There is no way Ellis could make that statement with a straight face.

Reply

Deborah Anthony

8:08 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Please do not get hung up on the government efficiency argument. CEO Ellis makes a valid point, both about the shaky ground on which Rep. Jacobs bases his "permission slip" op ed, and about the stakeholders left out of the current process.

Reply

HamBurger

10:10 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Mr. Ellis, I understand the DeKalb County BOC has tried several times to get you to eliminate the unnecessary position being held by William “Wiz” Miller. You want to update us and let us know when “Wiz” will be gone?

Word on the street from all the DeKalb County employees is that you are visiting Washington regularly for career advancement in the DC area. Is President Obama showing any interest in you?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deborah Anthony

6:59 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

How do these things get started? Mr. Ellis has family in the DC area.

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

12:39 pm on Friday, March 2, 2012

Ms. Anthony, I am not talking about family visits. I am talking about visits to DC to lay ground for a nice job in the next Obama administration.

Please pass that yellow mustard . . .

Barb Halaburt

10:46 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Well, first of all Mr. Ellis, you do nothing to advance your position with me when you refer to me as "choice residential property". We all know that is code for high tax base. Basically you are saying that you do not want to lose my “choice” tax revenue because it will increase the tax burden on others. (ie: your voting base)

But what am I getting for my “choice” tax contribution? What I really want, but am NOT getting, is responsive and efficient government services for my tax dollar. How about stricter code enforcement so my part of Dekalb County has the same consistent and 'cared for' look as Dunwoody or Sandy Springs? How about local government employees that treat me with respect, not disdain and indifference?

You see... I dont care if my taxes go down. I would even accept an increase...what I want is quality government for my tax dollar. And you, Mr Ellis have not been providing that to the citizens of North Dekalb County. So, dont you even think about playing the race card...that is NOT what this is about. (“ The current law also creates economic classism and dilutes the voting strength of minorities.”) This is about wanting efficient, effective and responsive government. If you cant provide it, get out of the way and let us seek it on our own.

Reply

Bill Lowe

1:16 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

Actually what Mike Jacobs and all of the other Brokehaven proponents will never publicly say is this: "We are tired of our tax money being spent on financing infrastructure improvements in South DeKalb county instead of being spent on financing infrastructure improvements in the neighborhood where the tax money originated from."

Go ahead, refute it.

Here is the funny quote of the day: “Our motto is ‘better services, lower taxes,’ but before we can discuss why we think we can do a better job of spending our money than the county, we have to get the right to vote,”

My interpretation of the quote of the day is: Once we have the chance to vote, then we can discuss why we think we can do better. It should be the other way around really. Discuss first, then vote.

On a side note about the OP/ED piece in the AJC---which left no room for comments: Mike, did you get permission slips from all of the neighborhoods when you drew up this freakishly crazy map of Brokehaven? The cityhood process does need to be revisited---almost to the point of a public referendum to determine if there is enough interest to justify a study---if the public is interested then the government can foot the bill instead of a handful of people that live closer to Dunwoody than Brokehaven.

Funny quote of the day: By J. Max Davis jr.....Non-elected leader of the Brokehaven movement.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hank1234

7:05 pm on Friday, March 16, 2012

"We are tired of our tax money being spent on financing infrastructure improvements in South DeKalb county instead of being spent on financing infrastructure improvements in the neighborhood where the tax money originated from."

No need to refute it; you're right! Ask someone without a microphone in their face, they'll tell you the same.

I live in Brokehaven (sic) and I don't see anything wrong with wanting our "choice" tax dollars to stay around here. We earned the money to purchase the "choice" real estate, we earn the money to pay the taxes on the "choice" real estate, the money should stay close to that "choice" real estate. The same ancestors Mr. Ellis quoted in his letter would be shocked at the general acceptance of this plunder which is exactly why we have a Republic instead of a Democracy.

NorthDeKalbCounty.org

7:28 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

As the readers of the AJC are more spread out geographically, than those who are inside the boundaries of the proposed city, myself and many many others that live on the north side of town, do realize this affects every person in DeKalb County and conversely beyond that. There is an old saying that its easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission. I think that strikes right at the heart of this matter. In politics, it may be easier, faster, and more gratifying to do what you want, even if it may adversely affect others, this is not a trait or method of governance that I approve of in my elected officials.
Our government by design, is intended to be inclusive, to move slowly, deliberately, and with much trepidation. This is the only way our system can work for everyone and regulations, and yes, maybe sometimes permission, is the only way to ensure that ALL citizens who are affected ARE NOT EXCLUDED. In my opinion, what defies logic is your belief that it’s alright for you and a handful of your supporters to impose your own will on nearly 50,000 citizens without asking THEIR PERMISSION FIRST. Permission from constituents, like other things worthwhile, is an ideal you should strive for. After all, to gain permission is to promote involvement and participation and isn’t that what a democracy is all about? I hope it still is and will always be. After all, isn’t our most precious virtue as a country supposed to be: Of the People, By the People and For the People?

Reply

Kevin G Hughley

7:38 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

On Thursday, March 1, 2012 at 7:30pm the African American ministers that represent the following churches in Brookhaven held a press conference to appose the City of Ashford on constitution grounds and economic issues. The new city violate the fourteenth and fifteen amendment of the United States Constitution and the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The new city will cost DeKalb County between $20-29 million dollars and raise the millage rate 2.79 out side the new city. Only 68 out of 227 polled by representative Jacobs wanted a new city and finally the new city dislute minority community in DeKalb county. The following African American ministers in Brookhaven came out in apposition of the City of Brookhaven based on these facts: Lynwood Park United Church of God In Christ, China Grove Missionary First Baptist Church, Little Zion Baptist Church,Greater Mount Carmel AME Church, and Saint Peters True Holiness Church. Kevin G Hughley,President of Brookhaven Chamblee Home Owners and Neighborhood Business Alliance

Reply

NorthDeKalbCounty.org

8:04 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

Part 2. Mike Jacobs and friends, the voice of the few should never out weigh the voice of the many. United we are strong and divided we will fall. Your letter in the AJC did not make you sound more credible. It made you look like you actually do think you can get a few buddies and do what you want. It's time perhaps you start listening. When you were asking for us to vote for you what do you think it was you were asking for? Permission. Permission to represent us. Whomever is in your ear lately is giving you bad advice. You should listen to ALL of your constituents, and yes, ask their permission before you lead them into a bad situation. IMHO. Thank you.

Reply

Judy Robinson

8:15 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

With regard to DeKalb County and "services": I've lived in Ashford Park for two years having left Fulton County/City of Atlanta. I remain a property owner in both counties. DeKalb County has far superior services, employees and efficiencies. I shudder when I have to deal with Fulton County or the City of Atlanta generally setting aside a block of time even to make a phone call never mind having to personally go to any of their offices. It is a nightmare. Not true in DeKalb. Living here is a pleasure. We can't have it all--low taxes and increased services.

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Resident

8:36 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

And if the area becomes a city, you will still have the pleasure of living in DeKalb County.

A Resident

8:35 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

@NorthDekalb I don't get how your idea of representative government works. Do we hold a referendum to see if a constituency wants to hold a referendum on an issue. Maybe we should hold a referendum on whether we should hold a referendum to hold a referendum. I think not. The only way you know whether an initiative has the needed support to become law, is to vote.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Thomas Porter

9:42 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

@Resident 30319, the process would seem to be better served by creating a detailed and vetted credible study of the actual costs first, followed real poll of ALL people in the proposed city limits to determine whether to proceed with any legislation. If that was done I missed it (and I'm still missing an accurate study).

NorthDeKalbCounty.org

9:33 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

And who is it that decides what you get to vote on? Is it our elected officials that we have given the permission to represent us? Look, there is only one land. In the end, we all have to live together. OK...Go. Bash away.

Reply
Comment_arrow

A Resident

9:48 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

I think it is our elected officials who decide what referendum question goes on our ballot. Some things they get to decide in the legislature somethings have to come to us for a vote.

A Resident

9:54 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

@Thomas Porter Why would you suggest the CVI document is not a study of accurate costs. Please name an organization that you would use instead of the University of Georgia.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HamBurger

12:42 pm on Friday, March 2, 2012

Resident 30319, Does the Vinson study show cost projections out to say twenty years? You know, something to show that after a number of years the city will not be having problems like East Point is having?

May I have some thin sliced onions?

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

8:16 pm on Friday, March 2, 2012

Interesting . . . I have asked that question several times now and I just cannot seem to get an answer.

Pass those thin sliced pickles to if you don’t mind . . .

NorthDeKalbCounty.org

10:05 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

At the core of this action concerning the City of Ashford, a line was crossed. I think the sheer excitement of the idea got those who are driving it moving too quickly. Government, while its not always popular, is designed to move at a slow pace, as the decisions that are made are profound. It is much easier to make a bad decision than it is to remedy it. That's why due diligence is so important.

Reply

A Resident

10:28 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

@NorthDekalb Who decides if an action is moving 'too quickly' or 'too slowly'? If more voters than not believe the city initiative has moved too quickly, it will be defeated in July. If on the other hand, more voters believe they have sufficient information and vote in favor of the initiative it will pass. In the end, it's the voters who will decide if the speed of the process was correct.

Reply

NorthDeKalbCounty.org

10:40 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

Ok. I'm wrong. You're right. This could go on and on and on. Have a great day. And I hope which ever way this goes, it's the way that benefits everyone. Sigh.

Reply

Mark Graffagnino

11:26 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

How embarrassing that this is what passes for political discussion/debate by our so called leaders….blatantly false statements.

“Ask any newly created city, revenues are always over-estimated and expenses are underestimated.”
Not in Dunwoody.
Not in Johns Creek.
Not in Milton.
Not in Sandy Springs.

“if the referendum passes, residents of Ashford/Brookhaven will pay more in property taxes than they do right now.”
There is a millage cap in the bill which guarantees the millage rate will be at about 3 mills LESS than is currently in unincorporated DeKalb. And to make this statement after raising property taxes in the Brookhaven footprint by almost 80%. Unbelievable.

“We are the most efficient government of its size, anywhere.”
This is just more amusing than anything.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Enuff Govt Already

11:47 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

Dunwoody's 5 year financial forecast shows they will be spending more than they take in starting next year. Johns Creek is looking for money to fund promised road prjects. Mlton's financial projections also show more in expenses than revenue. The CVI/Brookhaven also states there is a deficit of $1,272,623 based on revenue estimates using 2010 taxes.

Comment_arrow

William

2:53 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

(I tried typing this once) I'll try again.

Here are the facts.

DeKalb's population increased by only 4% from 2001 to 2011. Unincorporated DeKalb's population decreased by 4%. Again those are facts. Feel free to check the US Census Bureau for those numbers.

The tax funds budget in 2001 was $420 M. In 2011, it was $542 M. The budget increased by over 29% while population in unincorporated DeKalb shrunk.

DeKalb is spending 30 to 40% more PER CAPITA than it did in 2001. That is truly remarkable. It's even more remarkable that the CEO tries to make the efficiency argument with a straight face based upon those numbers.

Don't take my word for it...here is Commission Jeff Rader saying the same thing in 2010.

"In 2001, the first year of the former CEO’s administration, DeKalb County had a $420 million budget. If that budget was sufficient to fulfill the county’s mandate at that time, then it should have continued to be the benchmark in the subsequent years while allowing for inflationary and population increases."

http://repjacobs.com/2010/02/08/not-the-time-for-business-as-usual/

Comment_arrow

Dean

2:56 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

Thank you William, we all know how poor of a job DeKalb County Government has been as stewards of our budget, but this clearly quantifies it.

Comment_arrow

William

3:25 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

By the way, I love that Enuff and Chip cite ZERO sources.

Dunwoody will be spending more than they take in next year? That might be news to the City of Dunwoody.

By the way, if you are interested in FACTS try using sources.

The CEO said 'revenues are always 'over-estimated'...is that easy to fact check? Yes, it is.
Carl Vinson predicted $18.7 M in annual revenue for Dunwoody.
http://www.jkheneghan.com/city/Task_Force/Finance_Admin/CVI_Dunwoody_Feasibility_Study_Update_20080113.pdf
Dunwoody had $26.1 M in revenue in 2011.
http://en.calameo.com/read/0004297460de820b03e41

See how easy that was? The CEO isn't telling the truth.

Here it is again...

Sandy Springs...CVI in 2003(!) estimated revenues of $66-$73 Million.
http://www.cviog.uga.edu/free-downloads/sandy-springs-incorporation.pdf

Sandy Springs in 2012...almost 10 years later. After running at $80M, Revenues are down from 2011 $5.3 M to......$75M.
http://www.sandyspringsga.org/getmedia/e830764d-731f-40d5-a656-c9d532a14621/FY12-Budget-Presentation-%282011-05.24%29;;.aspx;.html

See how easy that is? The CEO cites a statistic. You do a google search and you can find that it isn't accurate.

Comment_arrow

Enuff Govt Already

6:16 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

@William--try Heneghan's blog on Jan 22, 2012 for Dunwoody's financial forecast(dunwoodynorth.blogspot.com/2012/01/city-of-dunwoody-financial-forecast.html) and try the CityofMilton/Finance and check either Budget or Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports...hope that helps

Comment_arrow

William

6:56 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

It does help...it helps see that your opinions have no basis in facts.

1) Those show Dunwoody projections through FY 2015. That doesn't match your '5 year financial forecast.'
2) That was a forecast that was for the Dunwoody city planning retreat as part of a presentation on maintaining competitiveness and budget flexibility in the coming years. It was NOT an official forecast for Dunwoody finances.
3) For example, the report you cite understates budgeted revenues for 2012 by almost $1M based upon the actual Dunwoody FY 2012 budget. http://www.dunwoodyga.gov/2012%20Approved%20Budget%20-%20Downloadable.pdf
4) Vague references to 'try this' or 'try that' don't really help your credibility.
5) Here is a real reference to the City of Milton's budget. They currently have a reserve fund of $7.8 M. Here is a quote from that budget "Since the City has built such a healthy fund balance to be utilized for capital expenditures, we are proposing for the first time that we should use these reserves to fund a few of the capital projects this year, namely the intersection improvements for the Hopewell Rd/Francis Rd/Cogburn Rd intersection and additional funding for pavement management. The recommended appropriation of the fund balance is $1,298,871. The remaining fund balance is projected to be around $6.5 million."

I don't fault anyone for their opinion. But I fault for spreading factually inaccurate info.

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

7:30 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

Mr. William, we missed you at the Senate committee hearing today. It was interesting hearing folks state their reasons for their opposition to the new city. One of my favorite citizen responses was the lady that had some dealings with Milton that had a friend living in the new city of Peachtree Corners. It is not a good thing to have your city compared to a homeowners association. Have you ever been associated with a homeowners association? Seasoned landowners tend to avoid them like the plague; the beauty of single family residence in unincorporated DeKalb with a property not connected to a HOA. The icing on the cake was that one of the committee members asked for a show of hands of attendees in favor of a new city. The first two rows were smacking their lips on Chick-Fil-A sammiches voting yes and the rest of us were voting NO NEW CITY. Talley? ¼ yes, ¾ NO! Sientific and representative of the voting population? No, but a good start.

Additionally, there was a lot of information shared that contradicted the highly praised Vinson study.

Hamburgers for lunch tomorrow with thin sliced pickles and onions and yellow mustard tomorrow!

Chuck Konas

1:49 pm on Friday, March 2, 2012

I had to laugh when I read Rep. Jacob's attempt to compare this Cityhood issue with the American revolution. His analogy not only shows his ignorance of our history but also to what lengths we will go to try to distort the truth. Except for the brave soldiers who faced the British, France was the only reason we won our independence. The only analogy to be made between this issue and the American revolution is our taxation without his proper representation. His actions in this issue have been deplorable.

Reply

NorthDeKalbCounty.org

1:53 pm on Friday, March 2, 2012

One could say that Mikes article could have been a little insight into his character. One could say. Not me. But one. You know. That guy.

Reply

William

2:46 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

'It is wrong to mislead residents into thinking that somehow their taxes will go down if they create a new city. Ask any newly created city, revenues are always over-estimated and expenses are underestimated."

So every city must have busted into the $40 Million reserve fund, ruined their credit rating, raised taxes by 25% to cover that gap, and haven't dealt with the problem of unfunded pensions just like the CEO's budgets have done over the past few years, right?

Oh...you mean Dunwoody, Milton, Johns Creek, Sandy Springs, and even older cities like Roswell, (http://www.roswellgov.com/index.aspx?nid=126), Smyrna (http://www.ci.smyrna.ga.us/index.aspx?page=419), and Marietta (http://www.mariettaga.gov/city/news/readarticle?id=1621) haven't had to raise their millage rates and destroy their reserves over the same period of time?

Wait...well, at least the CEO has taken care of that unfunded pension problem following the lead of the City of Atlanta...wait, who? (http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2011/06/23/the-deal-is-struck-atlanta-pension-overhaul-agreement-reached/)

It's ironic that the CEO cites a fictional character like the 'boogeyman'....because clearly sometimes truth is much scarier than fiction.

Reply

A Resident

7:56 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

I heard that most who favor a city have to work for a living and couldn't attend.

Reply

HamBurger

9:48 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

Maybe you are right.

However, there were a lot of folks not smacking on their Chick-Fil-A that were there because they felt it so important that they appear to oppose this city that is about to be crammed down their throats that they took off work to oppose it. Did these “YES” folks not feel that this was important enough for their appearance? Evidently not, where were they?

Rep. Taylor was red-faced and walking around like a cat on a hot tin roof. He just could not find a seat to suit him. There were several times when legitimate information was presented against a new city Rep. Jacobs had a WTF look on his face. That is right, Rep. Jacobs, WTF? How dare you force your ill-prepared city on citizens not willing to comply with your abuse of our desires.

Rep. Jacobs, Rep. Taylor, and company would be better served assisting in correcting our existing county government and school system instead of wasting our time with new city non-sense!

Reply
Comment_arrow

William

9:14 am on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

"that is about to be crammed down their throats"- Translation, that a majority of their neighbors approve in a referendum. Glad to see rational discussion on this.

Here is the point, Hamburger...every thing that is wrong with how the county delivers municipal services is encapsulated in Ellis's response above.

Let's break it down: First what the CEO doesn't address in Rep. Jacobs' AJC article

-Ellis doesn't address why DeKalb, the self proclaimed 'most efficient government' had to raise taxes by 26% and drain the operating fund by $40M in order to operate while surrounding governments either refused to raise the millage rate or had much lower millage rate increases during the same time period
- The CEO doesn't address wasteful projects during a time of recessionary spending like the Porter Arts Center or the Soap Box Derby track
- The CEO doesn't address the need for the self-proclaimed 'most efficient government' to increase its budget this year and to increase the CEO's office budget by 6.5% while projected a property digest decline of 5%

Maybe I missed those...but I'm pretty sure he didn't address any of those in his response.

Comment_arrow

HamBurger

9:39 am on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Mr. William, the senate committee meeting yesterday was very telling. The answer is not a new city, let’s band together and fix what we have.

Excuse me, I have to go thin slice those onions and pickles . . .

NorthDeKalbCounty.org

11:18 pm on Monday, March 12, 2012

Hey folks. I video taped the entire meeting. All 3 hours of it. I'm squashing it down to post it on northdekalbcounty.org.
And while you are there, fill out the survey. In the audience there were about 2/3 Opposed and 1/3 Favor the City of Ashford. There were appx 70 to 80 people there. Keep checking the site - probably mid morning tomorrow - it will be up. Thank you all for showing your support for your cause and showing up today. Big day!

Reply

"E Pluribus Unum"

8:23 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

A very good article by Commissioner Ellis. The political process has been hijacked by a well connected, influential few, using an incomplete and biased cost benefit study. Most of the community residents affected by the new city are unaware of the issues involved and have had no input. This is also true for all residents living in DeKalb County. The process needs to slow down. The entire DeKalb County residents should have an opportunity to vote of ANY new city. Finally, the tactic of creating unnecessary fear and resentment with county government to achieve political gain is obvious. What this has become is a sophisticated form of white flight IMHO.

Reply

Low and Behold

1:33 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

So what is it? Brookhaven CVI study is bad and there is NOT enough MONEY to support the city or Brookhaven is poaching more than its fair share of the valuable tax base. Come on people you can't play both sides.

HOLY MOLY ME OH MY! I can't believe Burrell Ellis' administration is taking a page out of Kasim Reed's playbook and paying an anonymous poster or 2 or 3 to flood message boards under different aliases with antagonistic and false information.

Its effective in that it discourages the typical reader from using the message boards to ask questions and get information thus making a vote for a Change that much harder to sell.

Well hope you anonymous paid posters at least spend some of your earnings in DeKalb. Because in the long run letting this ship run its course without change will hurt everyone.

Incorporation of both more areas of DeKalb also helps the County Government because it allows it to focus better on the services it can deliver.

Good luck, sorry I don't have time to stay, I'm on my way, but have to say, pay now or pay much more later.

Reply

Dean

1:54 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

You know, that is a good point, if DeKalb Government is so concerned that Brookhaven citizens are making a mistake incorporating because the CVI study is wrong (not that it is true but that is the FUD they are slinging), then the bureacracy should be glad to get the city level expenses from our area off their balance sheet...

Reply

Leave a comment