Brookhaven Candidates Learned Cityhood Tips from Dunwoody in Closed Meeting
The Brookhaven City Mayor and Council candidates met privately in Dunwoody to gain insight.
At an event hosted by State Rep. Mike Jacobs and Sen. Fran Millar on Monday morning, Brookhaven City Council candidates and members of the Governor's Commission for Brookhaven met to learn from Dunwoody officials about creating the City of Brookhaven.
The information session, hosted at Dunwoody City Hall, was closed to the public and the press.
“It was organized to enable the Brookhaven governor’s commission and candidates for the city council to hear first hand from people who were involved in setting up the city of Dunwoody,” Jacobs said in a Brookhaven Reporter article.
Included in the session were presentations from the Perimeter Community Improvement Districts and the Brookhaven Peachtree Community Alliance.
Brookhaven Patch is currently working to get more information about what exactly was discussed at the meeting and why it was closed to the public.
Grieg Ericsson
11:40 am on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Well there you have it folks. Brookhavens first official closed door, members only meeting. Folks get ready. Is this is a sign of things to come? You know the good ol' Brookhaven Boys club...
Thank you Kiri. This would have not been investigated under the old Patch Regime.
Grieg Ericsson
11:45 am on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
And one last thing....why the heck was Senator Fran Millar there? He ain't no Brookhavenite!
Eddie E.
12:26 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Senator millar wants to ensure we feel that 'dunwoody train' coming (his words).
Gen. James Oglethorpe
2:17 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
A physical sign of Brookhaven support by both GA Senate and House reps is a good thing, Greig.
HamBurger
4:34 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Mr. Grieg, Rep. Mike Jacobs and Sen. Fran Millar are not representing their constituents; they are representing Mike’s favorite neighborhoods. I just wonder what could have happened if five years ago these two had used their influence and made improvements to with DeKalb County and DeKalb School System. Nope, they decided to stick their heads in the sand and con folks into forming a new city. Like more government is really going to be better in the long run. So, the county government and school system have not been brought into check and we are kicking off this new city with closed door meetings. Folks just take it all in stride, but hey, they got their new city!
Please pass the yellow mustard!
Gen. James Oglethorpe
4:41 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Repeating a thing will not make it so, regardless of frequency or stridency:
" ...if five years ago these two had used their influence and made improvements to with DeKalb County and DeKalb School System. ..."
HamBurger
5:00 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Mr. General, well, now that they have created their new city do you think this could be their next extracurricular project? Or, do you prefer to continue to live in a county with a county government and a school system that has been neglected by its citizens and state elected officials because they were too busy creating a new city? You still live in DeKalb County with an embarrassing school system.
Please pass the yellow mustard!
Eric Hovdesven
5:05 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Personally I think its just a continuing movement to strip away power from the few remaining outposts of Democratic Party dominated governments.
Though I'm not certain I'd necessarily call DeKalb a model of the Democratic Party. And I think really what it will do is make people realize that in the end political party dogma doesn't really translate to local politics.
I also think if DeKalb County does this right they can become better, fewer responsibilities makes it easier for them and us constituents to focus. Anyway losing responsibility to run parks, police, roads and zoning should be a relief for DeKalb - seems like its always impossible to please everyone in these areas.
As to Schools, judging by the what I've heard about the Charter School proposal its probably best if the legislators are doing other things. Keep in mind these are the folks that don't pay into MARTA but won't lift the 50/50 split, the folks who gave billboard companies the right to cut trees in the public right of way and stop street scapes that could block their bill boards, the folks who in 30 years have studied but not yest built a commuter rail line on the existing tracks.
I think its something to do with the high humidity, it slows people down to the point that people like Sean, Rush and Neal make sense.
HamBurger
7:53 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Mr. Eric, regardless, from what I have seen none of the key Brookhaven Yes players have been involved at all in bettering their county and school system. The have been concentrating on their new city and the divisiveness it has brought to this community.
Please pass the yellow mustard!
Eddie E.
11:32 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Eric,
Welcome to the party, I'm glad you are catching on.
If one cannot gain electoral control over an area, one should modify the area, right?
That is how things work in the OnePartyState.....
And, even if it gets up to 150 degrees, rush, neal and handjob never make sense.
don Gabacho
1:13 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"...why the heck was Senator Fran Millar there? He ain't no Brookhavenite!..."---Grieg Ericsson
He's a member of the same clique of politicians role-playing as public servants which, as would any of the clique's members, gives him more to say on how we are to be governed than anyone who just happens to live in their 'footprint.'
don Gabacho
1:20 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"Mr. Grieg, Rep. Mike Jacobs and Sen. Fran Millar are not representing their constituents; they are representing Mike’s favorite neighborhoods."---Hamburger
No they are not. They are supporting the political clique---camarilla---that they belong to.
It has nothing to do with neighborhoods or political party.
don Gabacho
1:36 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"Personally I think its just a continuing movement to strip away power from the few remaining outposts of Democratic Party dominated governments."---Eric
It has nothing to do with "political party" and everything to do with the imposition of corporatist government by a power-hungry clique which has only one allegiance: themselves.
If brave enough Elena Parent should be able to tell you that.
Look who she supported for election.
Eric Hovdesven
11:06 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Eddie, I've always thought that. However, that's not what is driving most who favored cityhood. Specifically having a city some services and the county provide other more regional services is what appeals to many of us. I think counties providing municipal services in urban areas is unique to Georgia (or is it the south?) and I don't think its a good way to do things.
Having the county CEO and Commissioners responsible for a more defined set of services will make them more efficient and/or accountable on election day. Likewise with the city council folks being responsible for a limited set of services they also will be more accountable on election day.
Eric Hovdesven
12:15 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Kiri its the Perimeter CID not Peachtree CID.
Grieg if all of the Council candidates were invited for gathering information I don't see that as a smokey room/good ol' boys issue. We can't reasonably expect every training/informational session to for candidates to be open to the public, though I believe its reasonable to ask for notification that such meetings occurred, who attended and generally the agenda - which it appears was provided.
Grieg Ericsson
12:22 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
It's not the attendees that concern me as much, although I do know that candidates were there also. My biggest concern is that the secrecy and the non transparency has already started with Mikey...king of the what the constituency doesn't know won't hurt them club.
Eric Hovdesven
1:18 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Since we have such a wide range of candidates, if they were all invited its not secret and actually pretty transparent.
Kiri Walton
1:18 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Sigh. My apologies for the slip-up and thanks for catching it! I was thinking Perimeter and accidentally typed Peachtree!
Grieg Ericsson
1:26 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Then supply us with a list of the attendees and the meeting minutes. If the candidates were indeed there let's see who comes out and displays the transparency they all talk about. I'm pissed! It's one thing to say transparency...it's another thing to be transparent! We have had enough of the good ol boy network in this whole cityhood debacle. Let's not have even more! People...stand up! We already know cityhood is going to cost us more....let's at least hold on to our say in what we will be paying more for! Is this the J Max Davis and Mike Jacobs version of the Local Control they were touting on the campaign trail for cityhood?
Eric Hovdesven
4:03 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Grieg I think its safe to assume that if all the candidates, including any of the No City and now Brookhaven candidates were not invited we will quickly be informed of that.
Kiri In your defense there are a lot of both names around these parts. BTW, isn't Perimeter Center and oxymoron? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perimeter_Center
don Gabacho
1:16 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"We can't reasonably expect every training/informational session to for candidates to be open to the public,.."---Eric
"Training"?
By those guys?
Eric. you're not well.
Phil
1:33 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Is it just me? I think it makes sense that to maximize the value of the meeting for the candidates it seems totally reasonable to have this meeting closed. We already have had posters here complain that the first commission meeting did not allow for input from the audience.
Can you just imagine trying to inform all these candidates on what they need to know with an audience mad that the meeting was open, but they were not involved due to time constraints?
Better to focus on 20 candidates getting the information and the time to ask questions without the risk of people taking pot shots at the commission and the candidates.
Grieg Ericsson
1:40 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Phil,
Then supply us with a list of the attendees and the meeting minutes. If the candidates were indeed there let's see who comes out and displays the transparency they all talk about. No one said public commentary should have been allowed but the public should have been notified and given the ability to sit and listen. Otherwise, hush and please refrain. You give me gas. http://youtu.be/R6dm9rN6oTs
Prissy Mae Millendorf, Brookhaven Socialite
2:54 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Oh dear Mr. Ericsson:
You are quite that testy, old crusty fart! Sit quietly now while my nurse provides you with a hyperbole dose of GasX. And in the words of Mother Tums... "There, there..."
I shall invite you to one of my wonderful soirées once your insides tone down.
Fondly,
Ms. Millendorf
Grieg Ericsson
3:27 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Prissy Max Davis,
Lets kiss.
HamBurger
4:38 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Mr. Grieg, shhh! She is over at Bill’s having a “cigar” . . .
Please pass the yellow mustard!
don Gabacho
1:42 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"...but they were not involved due to time constraints?..."---Mikey---uhh---Philip
"Time constraints"?
"Time" was disallowed by the Governor. Recall?
You are being worse than disingenuous.
Prissy Mae Millendorf, Brookhaven Socialite
6:36 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Oh my dears Mr. Ericsson & Mr. BeefPuss:
What a delightful laugh I have had with your comparisons of me to Mr. Davis. How utterly drole & fully erroneous.
Mr. Ericsson, I would be more than happy to accept your kiss since it would mean I would be kissing both you & one of your alters Mr. BeefPuss at the same time. Kind of like eliminating two birds with one stone.
However, I would be so surprised if you would accept my confirmation of your invitation to kiss since I am under the clear belief from your voluminous comments that you & I don't play for the same team. Many sighsssssssssss......
At any rate, I'm so appreciative of your request.
Fondly & Gleefully,
Ms. Millendorf
Prissy Mae Millendorf, Brookhaven Socialite
3:37 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Oh dear curmudgeon BeefPuss:
Alas, I know of no one by the name of Bill & I certainly don't smoke cigars. Perhaps you are confusing me with someone else at your friend Bill's cigar establishment. I have it on record that you attend his parties and tete a tetes quite regularly. Happy smoking.
Gleefully,
Ms. Millendorf
Gen. James Oglethorpe
2:13 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Dunwoody, GA - "Several Brookhaven political hopefuls seen in different locations at different times, all unrelated."
The lack of transparency and prior public notice is appalling around here. This is horrible, worse than DeKalb. Or not:
http://www.ajc.com/news/news/dekalb-board-gives-short-notice-on-vote-for-school/nSKm3/
"Four administrators in the DeKalb County school system will get a pay raise because of a vote Monday afternoon that occurred with just over four hours public notice. ..."
Grieg Ericsson
2:28 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Both are examples of the sad state of affairs we the people are subjected to by our government and representatives. If this were the 60's there would be a demonstration on every corner.
Gen. James Oglethorpe
2:53 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
That, neighbor is YOUR best post ever.
"Stuck on stupid," Ericsson longs for ineffective activism, political unrest, and chaos.
Grieg Ericsson
3:26 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Yo mama!
Gen. James Oglethorpe
3:47 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Eleanor Oglethorpe (1662–1732) was an employee of the royal household during the reigns of Charles II and James II. She followed James II to France, where he was exiled after the Glorious Revolution. Eleanor and her husband Theophilus Oglethorpe returned to their estate outside London, but remained secretly and actively in the service of the House of Stuart. After Theophilus and William III died in 1702 she became an advisor to Queen Anne, even as she continued working for the Jacobite cause. Eleanor Oglethorpe was the mother of James Edward Oglethorpe, the philanthropist, social reformer, politician, and soldier who founded Georgia.
Mama was a laundress, worked hard, married well, and became successful enough to afford me a life of education and breeding, so I could be Founder to the State in which you currently reside.
Greig, what have you ever done?
HamBurger
7:47 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Mr. General, the individual behind your Patch persona certainly has a big ego and an inflated value of himself.
Special hamburger?
Grieg Ericsson
10:06 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Gen., (J Max)
I just let my dog crap on your lawn.
General Oglethorpe
11:27 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
HamBurger your persona has inflicted it's infected nonsense upon everyone for almost one year now; surely you ARE the best source of information on ego and inflated self-importance.
You lost and now you scramble about, a'pouting, a'pontificating, and a'being an a$$.
As to Grieg, he's just a poor boy, nobody loves him, Scaramush, Scaramush, will you do the Fandango?
Eddie E.
11:36 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Oglethorpe,
The 'yo mama' comment points to a huge part of the problem.
That being the lingering plantation mentality and the notion that those of us not to the manor born should 'politely accept our station'.
When pigs fly.
don Gabacho
1:51 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"Ericsson longs for ineffective activism, political unrest, and chaos."----General James Oglethorpe
Just roll over for tyranny.
And dissent as tyrants define it: "ineffective activism, political unrest, and chaos."
Right Ogle?
Mike
6:26 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Thank you and good work Kiri for this article and especially for your last sentence- "Brookhaven Patch is currently working to get more information about WHAT exactly was discussed at the meeting and WHY it was closed to the public." Most reporters rarely ask such questions anymore!
Grieg Ericsson
10:11 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Agreed Mike. Thank you Kiri.
don Gabacho
1:57 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"WHAT exactly was discussed at the meeting and WHY it was closed to the public."---Mike
They certainly appear to be anxious to impose a police force, to enforce their (unelected) governance, without "input" by the public.
Clockdale already "chairs" one that they still keep secret.
TomMiller
10:10 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
This isn't private business, so the meeting should have been open.
Eddie E.
11:50 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
No, but all the 'services' will be provided by private business.....
Which will end up costing much more.
Brookhaven Maven
11:01 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Word on the street has it that in addition to the candidates and the commissioners, the CIVILIAN CO-CHAIRS of the governor's commission committees were also invited to this closed meeting. The meeting was about a lot more than just general advice to candidates and commissioners.
Kiri -- Please see if you can verify this, as well, and let us know. Thank you!
Tagline -- Brookhaven: What did you expect?
-- The Maven
Kiri Walton
6:12 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Hi Brookhaven Maven, yes the civilian co-chairs also attended, Rep. Jacobs told me yesterday. I'll have his full story on the meeting up later this morning.
Grieg Ericsson
6:58 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
I love the after the fact explanations by Mike. Pretty typical. Like what can we do about it now? Get a time machine? The meeting was attended by council members, committee members and their buddies. If you are not in the clique, you're out.
http://theotherbrookhaven.blogspot.com/2012/08/post-2-brookhaven-series-governmental.html?m=1
Albie Alright
2:08 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Hi Kiri,
Any updates?
Kiri Walton
6:12 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Hi Brookhaven Maven, yes the civilian co-chairs also attended, Rep. Jacobs told me yesterday. I'll have his full story on the meeting up later this morning.
Shawn Keefe
11:14 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Stop believing the "word on the street".
Brookhaven Maven
11:27 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Shawn --
Did they leave you out?
Since you are Communications Committee Co-Chair, I'll ask you this --- Why such late notice on the Police Committee meeting tomorrow night? Less than 24 hours notice of this meeting.
don Gabacho
2:03 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"Stop believing the 'word on the street'."---Shawn Keefe
Were you there? And, if so, is this all you have to say about the meeting?
BTW, when your name came up as a "citizen co-chair" on one of the committees, I wasn't surprised.
From the beginning, that's how low my regard has been for this governance and its perps.
Shawn Keefe
11:36 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
The notice of the Police Committee meeting was announced as soon as the meeting was scheduled. Please remember, the committee co-chairs were just finalized and announced less than 24 hours ago.
Eddie E.
11:49 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
that's right, we have an imaginary 'deadline' to achieve.
Why take the time and do things right when you can rush and waste all the money at once?
don Gabacho
2:30 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"Please remember, the committee co-chairs were just finalized and announced less than 24 hours ago."---Shawn Keefe
And your first act as a "citizen co-chair" was to agree to a meeting of such insulting short notice on even who is to police us?
Or was your agreement, or the agreement of any "citizen co-chair," even required?
Eddie E.
11:37 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
IF the meetings were open, how could the contracts be pre-determined?
There are big bucks here and you Citizens have to pay the taxes to make it happen!
Grieg Ericsson
7:06 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Ala Pat Hoban. Look at the Brookhaven ballot committee disclosures. Or the Brookhaven Yes disclosures. Pat Hoban was the single largest contributor to the Yes campaigns. Man, those 2013 Troncalli Motors police cars are almost on the delivery. And now he's on a committee. Funny business I tell ya. http://theotherbrookhaven.blogspot.com/2012/08/return-on-investment-you-decide.html
Kim Gokce
11:53 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Some co-chairs were not named or confirmed (believe it or not, they have a say-so in accepting - haha) in time to be invited to the City of Dunwoody event. The event would be sooooo disappointing to many of my peers here on Patch.
City of Dunwoody officials invited Brookhaven candidates and Commission volunteers to a briefing on Dunwoody's transition experience, initial operations, and current operations. It was a fantastic primer for candidates and a priceless opportunity to learn from the mistakes and the successes of Dunwoody. As a citizen, I would be outraged if this opportunity were not leveraged by the candidates and the Commission.
There was no "meeting" of the Commission and no shady dealings as some would like to imagine - attendees listened to our hosts and asked questions about everything from police vehicles to janitorial services to site selection criteria, blah, blah, blah. For those with a bent for conspiracies, please contact your district candidates for Brookhaven office or mayoral candidates and get their take on the event. I suspect every single one would agree that it was a great learning opportunity.
These candidates will be our leaders in just a few weeks. The Commission is bound by law to help prepare them. This event was for that purpose only. Period.
@Brookhaven Maven: The Police Committee meeting was scheduled at approx 6:56pm this evening and publicly posted at 7:36pm. As Co-Chair for communications, I will endeavor to better next time.
don Gabacho
2:11 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"The Police Committee meeting was scheduled at approx 6:56pm this evening and publicly posted at 7:36pm. As Co-Chair for communications, I will endeavor to better next time."---Kim Gocke
"Next time"?
When?
Twenty minutes before the next time?
How can you say nothing "shady" happened when you, for one, refused to cite "transparency" in government for refusing Dunwoody's, supposedly hasty, so-called "invitation"?
don Gabacho
2:39 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
PS: Why is the document now published and naming the citizen co-chairs not dated?
Kim Gokce
12:02 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
P.S. For those who want the word from the Commission, please subscribe to one or more of the following:
https://www.facebook.com/BrookhavenCommission
https://twitter.com/BrookhavenComm
Or, check the old fashion way at:
http://brookhavencommission.com/
We should have volunteer registration form online by tomorrow and I expect to see all of you filling one out. The degree of participation in our civic and municipal life will determine whether Brookhaven is more or less than it is now. Thank you for caring about your community enough to roll up your sleeves!
I'll suggest this theme for the next few months:
“Hard work spotlights the character of people: some turn up their sleeves, some turn up their noses, and some don't turn up at all. ” -Sam Ewing
don Gabacho
2:16 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"The degree of participation in our civic and municipal life will determine whether Brookhaven is more or less than it is now."---Kim Gokce
By "registering."
I'm a citizen and resident.
Nothing more should be required to participate in any civic matter.
Your chastising is telling.
Grieg Ericsson
6:05 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Roger That,
What is it that you are so fixated on Rogering? It's OK J Max. It's OK. Go have a 55 gallon drum of ice cream and hush!
Kiri Walton
6:16 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Hello Kim! When I click on the Brookhaven Commission website, it has no updates or information except Deal's creation of the commission and a notice of the very first public meeting. Can you please let me know where to go to see the updates and other info for the public? I think I am probably not seeing the link for it or something like that.
HamBurger
8:27 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
I'll suggest this theme for the next few months:
“Hard work spotlights the character of people: Some turn up their sleeves, some turn up their noses, and some don't turn up at all.” -Sam Ewing
===
Again, with regard to DeKalb County government and schools, and at the risk of annoying Mr. General, Rep. Mike Jacobs, Rep. Tom Taylor, Sen. Fran Millar, the C$ND and Brookhaven Yes board members fall into the latter two categories of Mr. Ewing’s quote.
“Political jokes aren't always funny ... too many of them get elected." –Sam Ewing
Special hamburger anyone?
General Oglethorpe
8:51 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Atta HamBurger, stick-to-it on the hard work theme as there is very little time.
That is one disadvantage that Brookhaven faces, a short time to get much done, but this is not an insurmountable issue with enough hands on deck.
HamBurger states a common concern, the wrong person gets elected. It will happen, as "People are screw-ups."
As well, local governance makes a poor political choice stand out and makes it easy to replace them.
Now if only a few others would feel as HamBurger does, we could all have hot cocoa and sing Kumbaya around the fire pit.
Or not.
HamBurger
8:58 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Mr. General, You still live in DeKalb County with a government that needs adjusting and embarrassing school system. Congratulations, it appears as if you are turning up your nose.
Please pass the yellow mustard!
General Oglethorpe
9:59 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Actually, HamBurger I am working with local, State and Federal government on a number of issue fronts, so kindly keep your uninformed opinions to yourself.
You choose to be prickly, to push aside a helping hand when offered.
Got to go to work now, suggest you put your brain in motion before engaging your fingers.
Albie Alright
1:17 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Kiri,
Any update on this?
Kiri Walton
6:12 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Hi Brookhaven Maven, yes the civilian co-chairs also attended, Rep. Jacobs told me yesterday. I'll have his full story on the meeting up later this morning.
Kim Gokce
12:16 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
@Shawn Keefe: Just met you but it is not too soon to say a very public, "Thank you!" I appreciate your rolling up your sleeves - lots to do and as Mr. Eddie E says above very little time to do it!
Grieg Ericsson
5:53 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Kim,
Please be sure to ask Pat Hoban to get you guys a car with several cup holders.
Perhaps his continued political contributions and his spot on the committees will shore up some nice vehicle purchases for the city police fleet from his Troncalli Automotive Group. You all should mandate that none of the committee folks companies or employers can be in the running for contracts or purchases in the city.
Grieg Ericsson
6:49 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
http://theotherbrookhaven.blogspot.com/2012/08/when-running-for-office-does-character.html
Grieg Ericsson
6:53 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
http://theotherbrookhaven.blogspot.com/2012/08/post-2-brookhaven-series-governmental.html?m=1
General Oglethorpe
8:21 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"The 'yo mama' comment points to a huge part of the problem."
I disagree that a 'plantation mentality' is a 'huge' problem at all. I am not even sure what that statement means, other than sounding bigoted. I do know that in dealing with DeKalb officials one's approach ought to be that of a 'supplicant' in order to get the simplest request fulfilled.
There are about three or four constant voices here, each rhyming the same tune. I get that that freedom of speech, 'we lost,' and all.
You may be surprised when Brookhaven is operational and actually improves public safety and roadways, in spite of your carping and whining about lack of transparency, conspiracy, and so forth.
Thank you Mr. Gokce for your current service. Brookhaven is lucky to have Kim serve, he is a person who is involved in the earliest phases of Cityhood and has tremendous knowledge of DeKalb Schools, as well.
The value of the peanut gallery is important, oversight and so forth. Just realize at some point, y'all become just so much noise - which is generally ignored. you will 'self-fulfill' and become less relevant unless you make some attempt to actually do some work.
'Brookhaven No' sees trust issues, political issues, but never a positive word from any of them about the time and effort expended by volunteers to address the REALITY that Brookhaven is NOW a City.
Work Alert: Time to get over yourselves and roll up your sleeves, your NEW reality is calling, make something of it.
Eddie E.
8:57 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
GO,
I am referring to the confederate notion of 'freedom' in which the 'plantation owner' is free to exercise his will upon the citizenry around him and anyone interfering with that exercise is concurrently interfering with his freedom.
Transfer that notion to the Dekalb County republican party and the similarities are striking.
We in the Brokehaven mudprint have been reluctant (at least south of Peachtree) to submit and elect republicans to any office. With no predicted change in that pattern, the only method to 'preserve freedom' was to invent a new boundary wherein the 'appropriate persons' retain authority and therefore 'freedom'.
Every step from the closed development of standards for the CVI, secret funding, extreme rush to invent and implement the city, vague attempts at transparency in 'committee' development will all lead to an interesting textbook in exceptionally inappropriate municipal governance.
Even then, I'm sure there will be staunch resistance to accept the flaws and project reasons for the impending failure.
On another note, why on earth would you expect a 'positive word' when the process is unfolding in a manner PREDICTED by the opponents of municipalization? Prove us wrong with an overwhelming dedication to responsible, transparent, open, development of governance, and you will get your positive word.
General Oglethorpe
10:14 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
EddieE,
Your explanations are interesting and clearly your democratic preferences bely history. The very same 'plantation owner' society was democratic from the Reconstruction until Purdue came on-board. Some would even argue little has changes since many current lawmakers were Dems and switched over.
SoPea voters don't have enough numbers to elect a dem? That's not submission, that's lack of numbers. You have an interesting world view, and I do not mean that disparagingly.
The fact is that the incorporation trend is an attempt to break the large County system of governance that is truly a 'yoke of oppression' on the very freedoms you envision. I can argue that large County government is the 'plantation owner' you so despise and that decision is vindicated by voter turnout.
The fact that DeKalb can only offer a 'benevolent dictator' in the form of a CEO seems not to both Brookhaven NO at all. The inane rallying cry of 'working with the County to overcome pan-DeKalb issues' is untenable because the County will not change itself, ever.
You go ahead and push for pensions, and other types of democratic institutions that are no longer sustainable, and I will push for smaller government. In the end it's a numbers game, 50% + 1.
True freedom, as our Founder envisioned it is diminished equally by both Parties, in the name of national security, etc.
Eddie E.
2:28 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
GO,
What is the problem you people have with 'pensions'?
Is it a suggestion that as soon as one has exhausted their working life they should politely die and prevent cutting into your gardening and pool maintenance budget?
Eddie E.
2:29 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
GO,
And who is 'our Founder'?
General Oglethorpe
3:05 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
I love pensions, Eddie.
If they are properly funded,
If those funds are not misused,
If they are actuarially sound, they are far better than 401K plans.
A lot of if's to trust to pols or union thug bosses you people seem to admire (;>)
I don't have a pool and do my own yard and garden work, TYVM.
'our Founder' should read 'our Founding fathers.'
Eddie E.
3:18 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
GO,
Thanks
That leaves two of us who do our own yard work.
General Oglethorpe
10:16 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
EddieE,
If the incorporation trend was driven by Democrats (ridiculous supposition, I know) would you oppose it?
Eddie E.
2:26 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Why yes of course I would.
Of course I doubt that Dekalb County Democrats would force such an ill considered and divisive issue on an amorphous group and pretend there was sufficient cohesion to call it a 'city'.
HamBurger
2:50 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Mr. General, and to expand on that thought, there are a Hell of a lot of conservatives that just cannot believe that Republicans would vote another layer of government for themselves.
Please pass the yellow mustard!
General Oglethorpe
3:10 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
HamBurger,
Poor solution to an intractable problem, agreed. Your premise that we should have spent time working with our elected officials to resolve pan-Dekalb issues is fallacious.
DeKalb County should have begun 'right-sizing' it's County operations after Dunwoody incorporated, if they were at all serious about making changes to improve governance. You just don't get it - The incorporation movement is going to continue on into Tucker, South DeKalb and other areas until the County becomes like Fulton, bare bones.
The People will control government, or the Union will perish.
"You people," EddieE really?
Eddie E.
3:15 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
GO,
It's just that attacking pensions has become a wrong-wing buzz phrase over the last year. Remember, deferred retirement compensation was sold as a reason to accept reduced current compensation. That the issuing authority (be it corporate or government) did not collect and set aside sufficient revenue to meet the obligations to which they were bound is certainly not the fault of the worker.
If you are whining about meeting the long established pension obligation then it makes you one of 'those people' barking at the straw man.
General Oglethorpe
3:23 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
I remarked on your previous comments about setting up pensions for Brookhaven Police, City employees, that's all.
Y
Eddie E.
4:18 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
GO,
Then state the whole concept. I have commented on ensuring there was adequate UNION REPRESENTATION for city workers. This is not something to trust to some bait-and-switch insurance broker.
General Oglethorpe
4:23 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
EddieE:
So tell me why government workers, especially, need Unions, please. Regret your confusion over my remarks about what you said, but I do recall your position that Brookhaven needs union representation to start. A premise I categorically reject.
Bait and swith insurance broker? Explain when you can. Your world view is so cynical, who do you actually trust?
Eddie E.
4:32 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
GO,
Why do city employees, especially public safety employees deserve adequate (Union Quality) protection?
Because the citizenry that professed this municipality to to be the great savior have been suggesting cutting every corner possible from day one.
Ensuring proper health care, long term accident recovery care, adequate retirement for a job well done are EXPENSIVE. This is a fact that may have eluded the city proponents. Once the costs are real, daily items who do you think those imbued with the notion made popular by the late harpy Leona Helmsley 'I don't pay taxes, little people pay taxes' are going to throw under the bus?
I trust very, very few people, and there are less than three in insurance among them.
General Oglethorpe
4:45 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Reasonable suppositions though you have a flair for hyperbole.
I would imagine that an Officer would not change departments if the pay and benefits were not superlative, especially a veteran Police professional. Right? I mean free will still works.
All of Dunwoody's Officers are veteran Officers, some cross trained in SWAT, other fields. The pay rate and benefits package is outstanding, educational allowances, car allowances, and so forth. No need for costly Unions. Why? Not necessary if the free market provides above average benefits.
Awhile back you railed on about how poorly roadwork would be accomplished, remember that? Once again, facts deny your point of view. Dunwoody roadwork completed by the same private contractors that build highways, to highly specific engineering standards. More roadwork done in four years than the previous 15 years.
I hope that Brookhaven has the same type of experiences, EddieE. Not to make you look bad, but rather to show you and others that smaller Cities work well.
I'll buy you a cold beer at 57th Fighter Group sometime, you are a worth the effort. Heck, I'll invite HamBurger along just to look him in the eye. Peaceful and neighborly, a 'learning moment.'
Eddie E.
6:14 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
GO,
A nice spin around the block, but I thought we were talking about Brokehaven, not Dunwoody as they are not US.
Unions offer defined, long term protection. I understand the potential temporary nature of our not-yet-established municipality so I comprehend the tentative approach for the short term. Of course, I intend to be here for a long, long time (unless it goes south and the need to lease my home out as an addict recovery center becomes necessary) and I would like to feel that any public safety officers feel a sense of 'dedication' to more than this week's check.
And it's nice that Dunwody pulled off a paving job across from Perimeter. I think I mentioned the 'blind hog finding an acorn' on another thread.
I moved away from a small town a few decades ago and the impending aggravations were examples of why.
Time will tell and if I'm right I'm sure the BYES folks will accept full responsibility for their arrogance.
Right?
HamBurger
6:32 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Mr. General, I understand that if city creation of geographical areas that have no relation to one another continues, DeKalb County will continue to fragment, have higher city and county taxes in incorporated and unincorporated areas, and be less attractive to own property in the county as a whole.
Instead of starting the incorporation craze in DeKalb, the “Smart People” with the assistance of their elected state officials along with the rest of North DeKalb should have organized and demanded government and school system changes in this county. Now we have two cities in the northern part of the county and our county government and school system still suck. And, we now have another layer of government. An organized effective citizen’s movement eight or ten years ago would have precluded little things like the recent DCSS pay raises you have noted not to mention the train wreck of a school system we now have. And, the folks in Decatur would be more attentive to our needs.
The more government you have the less quality of life you have. There were alternatives, but no one wanted to listen. Conservatives NEVER vote for more government, they always seek alternatives.
You might be interested in these potential new city links:
http://tinyurl.com/btzm8dw
http://tinyurl.com/cpqhutq
Please pass the yellow mustard!
Phil
10:24 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
The District 2 candidates debate tomorrow should be interesting. I hope there is the possibility of questions that can be posed from the audience even though it IS a debate. Maybe some elightenmentt on what went on in the Cityhood meeting.
Joan Dillon
10:41 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
I want to ask every candidate if he or she will pledge not to take bribes in the form of lunches/dinners/tickets/travel, or any other item of monetary value from a proposed vendor for the city. We need that kind of assurance from our elected representatives so that they do not sell us out to the highest bidder as the U.S. Govt has done.
Grieg Ericsson
1:08 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Joan,
The fix is already in. It's up to each of us to stop it.
Do a little independent research. Look at those on the commission and the committees and then look at the campaign contributions.
Here is a start for you.
http://theotherbrookhaven.blogspot.com/2012/08/return-on-investment-you-decide.html
Eddie E.
2:31 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Joan Dillon,
Agreed.
Unfortunately, I do think that ship has sailed.
TomMiller
3:09 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
OK those who say the meeting should have been open:
http://ethics.ga.gov/how-to-file-a-complaint/
There were representatives there. Get to work on a complaint.
Eddie E.
3:17 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Thank you Tom.
Of course, is there still a state employee assigned to follow up?
General Oglethorpe
3:12 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Keep in mind new GA law allows for the Complainant to be sued if the complaint is deemed frivolous.
Grieg Ericsson
3:40 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
General J Max,
Remember what you just wrote once the campaign heats up.
General Oglethorpe
3:47 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
I'd be careful about ascribing my comments Mr. Davis, Greig unless you are getting the IP addresses from Patch and can prove same. I'm just sayin;.
Phil
3:19 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Grieg Ericsson? How are you doing with your "The Other Brookhaven" blog spot? Are you getting alot of hits? BTW--yo udo a good job writing. I just do not believe what is written. And I do believe that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy. And planes hit the World Trade Center.
Grieg Ericsson
3:37 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
#1, It's not my blog but I do know the author.
#2, Don't believe what's written, who cares.
#3, Please tell Lee Harvey hello
#4, Please fly often...one way
#5, Was it you that stole J Max's lawnmower?
#6, Phil, Please refrain. :)
Grieg Ericsson
3:45 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Core Function Committees
Contracting & Proposals
Members: J.D. Clockadale (Commission Co-Chair), Pat Hoban (Citizen Co-Chair)
Looks like Brookhaven will have a RaceTrac gas station and Chrysler Police cars.
Brookhaven Maven
5:22 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
To Shawn Keefe @ 11:14 --
Reposting Kiri's response to my request for confirmation:
**Kiri Walton
**6:12 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
**Hi Brookhaven Maven, yes the civilian co-chairs also attended, Rep. Jacobs told **me yesterday. I'll have his full story on the meeting up later this morning.
and responding to your injunction to me to stop believing the word on the street ---
Looks to me like my street sources are better than your internal official communications sources. Or, if you knew that my information was correct, why didn't you confirm this yourself? More hiding the truth?
THIS MUST STOP!
-- The Maven
Brookhaven Maven
5:43 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
To Kim Gokce @ 11:53a --
The 10,900 people who voted on the cityhood issue probably pretty accurately reflects the interests of the 25,600 registered electorate of Brookhaven, as well as those of the 49,200 citizens of the resulting city. It is also very likely that 45% of the entire population either didn't want to be a city or didn't care. No conspiracists here, just 20,000 or so unhappy people.
You are a smart guy, so you should realize the handful of posters who are expressing their unhappiness at the way this whole thing has progressed probably represent 45 - 50% of the total population. A lot was done in secrecy or, minimally, with no real outreach to involve the entire community. This trend seems to be continuing, or else you guys are very confused.
Please answer this in your official capacity as Communications Guru: If this recent candidates /committees / commissioners meeting was as "disappointing" and mundane as you indicate, they why was it NOT an open meeting? Why was the general public excluded from attending and listening to what transpired? I suppose John Q Public will never know.
To paraphrase you --- As a citizen, I will never have the option to be outraged if this opportunity is not leveraged by the candidates and the Commission. And more's the shame for it!
Tagline -- Brookhaven: Move along, folks. Nothing to see here.
-- The Maven
Brookhaven Maven
5:58 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Mr. Gokce --
As a follow-up to my 5:43p post --- Why was the media banned from this Dunwoody meeting? Doing so simply antagonizes those who believe the city founders are being less than transparent. Again, what was the big secret that kept the reporters out? If the answer to that is that there was no big secret, then why were they excluded?
Since many, if not most of us, have to work for a living and may not be able to attend these events, we rely on the media (including blogs and fora) for our information. It would be great if you would see that this exclusion doesn't occur again without a very
good reason. Thank you.
-- The Maven
TomMiller
6:01 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
"You you should realize the handful of posters who are expressing their unhappiness at the way this whole thing has progressed probably represent 45 - 50% of the total population. "
Nope. That thinking is not logical. Remember logics from high school right? Using a few to support the belief that many agree with that is not logical.
The folks on here are just that - a small handful of people.
Brookhaven Maven
6:09 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
To Tom Miller @ 6:01p --
Then, you have just thrown out all of the statistical sciences developed over the last 50 years, not to mention every poll conducted (including that insidious Neilson poll for TV watchers), as well as sampling of chickens for infectious diseases. Way to go!
-- The Maven
Kim Gokce
8:15 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
I respect all who voted in the July 31 election regardless of vote. I voted ready to live with the results either way. Regarding the incredible opportunity Dunwoody presented to the candidates of Brookhaven, it was held at Dunwoody City Hall. It included walking around the facilities for hours. The goal was to provide a forum for candidate questions and to cram as much value and insight into the candidates as possible about the cityhood start-up that is staring them in the face. The meeting room did not have enough room to seat all the candidates, citizen volunteers, and commissioners that did attend.
The City of Dunwoody officials can be forgiven for planning and running a very efficient and productive session in my opinion.
While I appreciate the sentiments behind some of the criticism being shared here, critics are overlooking the common sense reality that there was no facility appropriate to publish an "all hands" invitation to the public and it would have been a disaster - not only in terms of diverting the candidates' attention from the purpose (their "training") but also in terms of safety.
These are my opinions and sense of the event. It was right. It was good. It was necessary. It was an enormous "gift" from the people and officials of the City of Dunwoody and I thank them profusely and publicly for their support the the Brookhaven startup efforts.
HamBurger
9:26 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Mr. Kim, you are keenly aware of the concerns that many folks have taken exception to regarding the process that has brought us to cityhood. Knowing such, and aware of the tight schedule for the committee to complete their work, advance notice is paramount for folks to have an informed warm and fuzzy about this new city. It may be a tough scheduling hand the committee has been dealt, but transparent and fast information sharing with reasonable notice will solve a lot of problems and make life easier for all of us. Street information and rumors are totally unacceptable.
Just a thought . . .
Please pass the yellow mustard!
Eddie E.
11:05 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Mr. Kim,
You identified a major concern that has hardly been addressed.
Throughout the development of our Republic, citizens with a sense of community have coalesced around central concerns and shared principles.
Over time, a central meeting location became accepted for presentation of grievances and discussion of mutual concerns.
Fast forward to today and we have a breach in the normal evolution.
Since the assemblage of neighborhoods have no real shared concerns, there has never been a development of location for discussion....
We now have a town, with no town hall.
I guess we can invent that too.
Kim Gokce
9:29 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
I think you are 100% USDA Choice Correct Beef.
HamBurger
9:37 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Mr. Kim, Choice? Respectfully, that would be Prime . . . I got customers, you know . . .
Cheerwine with that special hamburger?
Brookhaven Maven
10:02 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Really, Mr. Gokce? Really?
Even though you didn't address my specific comments in my earlier posts to you above, your global responses were interesting. I take away the following from them:
1) The Dunwoody City Hall facility is not large enough to have any sizeable crowd attend a function. Maybe we should revisit the Brookhaven City Hall requirements, since we will certainly want to invite our neighbors in central DeKalb across I-85 to a similar function to share what we have learned once THEY incorporate. We need to plan ahead so that we can host upwards of 200 people to such an event.
2) The number of people attending precluded allowing Dick Williams and Tim Darnell and another reporter to come in and witness progress in action. Really? They are pretty thin guys. No room for 3 more people? Really?
3) Regardless of promises made about transparency and open meetings, the people who are running the show are going to continue to do whatever they want and seek to placate / silence their critics with excuses and oblique justifications. Really?
Revised Tag Line -- Brookhaven: We're not Dunwoody, but we're copying them!
-- The Maven
Phil
10:26 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Kim -- I, for one, appreciate your willingness to step up and spend some of your free time without compensation to try to assist in helping the new City. As you can see, this apparently thankless task will be challenging when just factoring the critical input from the Patch Peanut Gallery that chooses to not do anything constuctive like you. But there are many who do value your willingness to contribute.
Eddie E.
11:07 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Phil,
Just think of the value the rest of us place on being LEFT ALONE.
Grieg Ericsson
11:50 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Phil-Doh,
Please refrain.
A Resident
11:11 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
@Kim, you need to learn to ignore the anonymous posters on this blog. They will continue to amuse themselves at your expense regardless of the actions you take. If you say blue, they'll say it's a conspiracy and it's really red. It's just a big game for folks without a real life. It's easy to make demands behind the protection of a nom de guerre. They don't volunteer their time, don't make contributions, don't add anything to the community. They just write drivel and accuse everyone else of being a part of what makes them feel societal impotency.
General Oglethorpe
11:14 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
What A Resident said...
Eddie E.
11:30 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
residual,
Just what does 'it's really red' mean?
Eddie E.
11:31 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
res,
Everyone knows who I am, just who the heck are you?
Grieg Ericsson
11:46 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
And what is your name Friendo?
Grieg Ericsson
11:51 pm on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
I volunteer all the time. Where's your rotund little bottoms been volunteering?
Kim Gokce
12:11 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
I appreciate the kind words of posters above but it really isn't necessary. I am happy to play "Grace Kelly" to the aggressive bloggers "George Burns" ... This job is not a thankless task at all. It is an honor and I'll continue to play straight man because that is all I wish to do. Hope to see all of you at tonight's Commission meeting!